Compare
aeo vs Apollo
Quick verdict
aeo leads on 7 of 10 comparable rows
aeo leads on Readiness Score, Battery, Countries, and Perception (+3 more). Apollo leads on Reality Score, Payload, and Manipulation.
Who should choose which?
Choose aeo if…
- Your main goal is elder care, which aeo targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Apollo if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Apollo targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | aeo  Aeolus RoboticsLeads 7 | Apollo  ApptronikLeads 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 78 | 76 |
| Reality Score | 82 | 84 |
| Data Freshness | 100% | 100% |
| Speed | Unknown | 3.4 km/h |
| Payload | 3.6 kg per arm | 25 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | Unknown | 173 cm |
| Weight | Unknown | 72.5 kg |
| Battery | 8 h | 4 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | Unknown | $50,000+ |
| Market Status | Limited | Limited |
| Availability | Limited | Limited |
| Countries | Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, United States | United States, Germany |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 80 | 80 |
| Manipulation | 84 | 86 |
| Perception | 82 | 78 |
| Autonomy | 78 | 68 |
| Social Interaction | 72 | 62 |
| Home Navigation | 68 | 55 |
| Sensors | 360° vision, night-vision camera, posture/position detection, obstacle avoidance | Stereo vision, IMU, force-torque sensing (fleet software stack) |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, web apps, native smartphone apps | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, fleet management APIs |
| Ecosystem | Robot-as-a-service (RaaS) leasing; Plug-and-play attachments; Asratec integrations (Japan); Malibu AI integrations (Taiwan); Remote scheduling and alerting apps | NVIDIA Project GR00T; Apollo fleet software; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programs |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.