HRHOMEBOT RADAR
Compare

aeo vs Reachy 2

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

aeo leads on 6 of 11 comparable rows

aeo leads on Payload, Countries, Mobility, and Autonomy (+2 more). Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Battery, and Manipulation (+1 more).

Who should choose which?

aeo
Choose aeo if…
  • Your main goal is elder care, which aeo targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Reachy 2
Choose Reachy 2 if…
  • You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Spec
aeo
Aeolus Robotics
Leads 6
Reachy 2
Pollen Robotics
Leads 5
Performance
Readiness Score
78
86
Reality Score
82
84
Data Freshness
100%
100%
SpeedUnknownUnknown
Payload3.6 kg per arm3 kg per arm
Specs
HeightUnknown136–166 cm
WeightUnknown32–50 kg
Battery8 h8–10 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
PriceUnknown$70,000+
Market StatusLimitedLimited
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesJapan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, United StatesUnited States, France, Global (direct order)
Intelligence
Mobility
80
68
Manipulation
84
88
Perception
82
86
Autonomy
78
72
Social Interaction
72
70
Home Navigation
68
58
Sensors360° vision, night-vision camera, posture/position detection, obstacle avoidance2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs
ConnectivityWi-Fi, web apps, native smartphone appsEthernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI)
EcosystemRobot-as-a-service (RaaS) leasing; Plug-and-play attachments; Asratec integrations (Japan); Malibu AI integrations (Taiwan); Remote scheduling and alerting appsROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.
View aeo →View Reachy 2 →