HRHOMEBOT RADAR
Compare

Apollo vs Figure 02

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Apollo leads on 7 of 11 comparable rows

Apollo leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Payload, and Countries (+3 more). Figure 02 leads on Data Freshness, Mobility, Autonomy, and Home Navigation.

The lead is a count of published spec rows, not an in-home test.

Who should choose which?

Apollo
Choose Apollo if…
  • You want higher readiness (76/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
  • Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
Figure 02
Choose Figure 02 if…
  • Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Spec
Apollo
Apollo
Apptronik
Leads 7
Figure 02
Figure 02
Figure AI
Leads 4
Performance
Readiness Score
76
60
Reality Score
84
66
Data Freshness
85%
100%
SpeedUnknown4.3 km/h
Payload25 kg20 kg
Specs
Height173 cm168 cm
Weight72.5 kg70 kg
BatteryUnknown5 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$50,000+Unknown
Market StatusLimitedDiscontinued
AvailabilityLimitedDiscontinued
CountriesUnited States, GermanyUnited States
Intelligence
Mobility
80
85
Manipulation
86
80
Perception
78
75
Autonomy
68
70
Social Interaction
62
55
Home Navigation
55
72
SensorsPerception stack unpublished on Apollo 2 page; LED mouth, chest status display, speech6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, Fleet Connect APIs (typical)Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi
EcosystemApollo 2 (bipedal or wheeled); Apptronik Artemis; Fleet Connect; Google DeepMind Gemini Robotics; Robot Park data collection; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programsHelix AI (company stack); Custom fleet management
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.
View Apollo →View Figure 02 →