HRHOMEBOT RADAR
Compare

Apollo vs Reachy 2

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Reachy 2 leads on 8 of 12 comparable rows

Apollo leads on Data Freshness, Payload, Price, and Mobility. Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Battery, Countries, and Manipulation (+4 more).

Who should choose which?

Apollo
Choose Apollo if…
  • Budget is a priority and Apollo lists lower ($50,000+).
  • Your main goal is home assistant, which Apollo targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
Reachy 2
Choose Reachy 2 if…
  • You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Spec
Apollo
Apptronik
Leads 4
Reachy 2
Pollen Robotics
Leads 8
Performance
Readiness Score
76
86
Reality Score
84
84
Data Freshness
100%
85%
Speed3.4 km/hUnknown
Payload25 kg3 kg per arm
Specs
Height173 cm136–166 cm
Weight72.5 kg32–50 kg
Battery4 h8–10 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$50,000+$70,000+
Market StatusLimitedLimited
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesUnited States, GermanyUnited States, France, Global (direct order)
Intelligence
Mobility
80
68
Manipulation
86
88
Perception
78
86
Autonomy
68
72
Social Interaction
62
70
Home Navigation
55
58
SensorsStereo vision, IMU, force-torque sensing (fleet software stack)2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, fleet management APIsEthernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI)
EcosystemNVIDIA Project GR00T; Apollo fleet software; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programsROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.
View Apollo →View Reachy 2 →