Compare

Apollo vs Stretch 4

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Stretch 4 leads on 8 of 12 comparable rows

Apollo leads on Reality Score, Speed, Payload, and Social Interaction. Stretch 4 leads on Readiness Score, Battery, Price, and Mobility (+4 more).

Who should choose which?

Apollo
Choose Apollo if…
  • Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
  • You prefer a humanoid form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Stretch 4
Choose Stretch 4 if…
  • You want higher readiness (84/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Budget is a priority and Stretch 4 lists lower ($29,950).
  • You need a buy now path today while alternatives are still prototype or coming soon.
  • Strengths like perception and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
  • You prefer a other form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Performance
Readiness Score
76
84
Reality Score
84
80
Data Freshness
100%
100%
Speed3.4 km/h2.2 km/h
Payload25 kg2.5 kg (extended) / 4 kg (retracted)
Specs
Height173 cm160 cm
Weight72.5 kg46 kg
Battery4 h8 h
FormHumanoidOther
Availability
Price$50,000+$29,950
Market StatusLimitedBuy Now
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesUnited States, GermanyUnited States, Global (direct order)
Intelligence
Mobility
80
82
Manipulation
86
88
Perception
78
90
Autonomy
68
74
Social Interaction
62
58
Home Navigation
55
86
SensorsStereo vision, IMU, force-torque sensing (fleet software stack)2× hemispherical 3D LiDAR (Hesai), 3× high-res cameras, 6× laser line sensors, wrist depth camera, IMU
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, fleet management APIsWi-Fi 5.2, Ethernet, USB expansion
EcosystemNVIDIA Project GR00T; Apollo fleet software; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programsROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Stretch Body software stack; Optional self-charging dock; Quick-release gripper tooling; Global distributor network (Japan, Korea, China)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.