Compare
EMO vs Reachy Mini
Quick verdict
Reachy Mini leads on 5 of 9 comparable rows
EMO leads on Price, Countries, Social Interaction, and Home Navigation. Reachy Mini leads on Reality Score, Data Freshness, Battery, and Perception (+1 more).
Who should choose which?

Choose EMO if…
- Your main goal is conversation, which EMO targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.

Choose Reachy Mini if…
- Your main goal is education, which Reachy Mini targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | ![]() EMO Living AILeads 4 | ![]() Reachy Mini Pollen RoboticsLeads 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 91 | 91 |
| Reality Score | 88 | 89 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 100% |
| Speed | Unknown | Unknown |
| Payload | Unknown | Unknown |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 12 cm | 28 cm |
| Weight | 0.25 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Battery | 2.5 h | 2–4 h |
| Form | Desktop | Desktop |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $279 | $299+ |
| Market Status | Buy Now | Buy Now |
| Availability | Available | Available |
| Countries | United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany | United States, France, Global (direct order) |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | Unknown | 28 |
| Manipulation | Unknown | 5 |
| Perception | 70 | 85 |
| Autonomy | 60 | 76 |
| Social Interaction | 95 | 90 |
| Home Navigation | 15 | 8 |
| Sensors | Camera, microphones, touch sensors | 120° 12MP camera (Sony IMX708), 4× PDM mic array (XMOS XVF3800), IMU (wireless only) |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi 2.4/5 GHz + USB (wireless); USB-C to computer (Lite) |
| Ecosystem | Living AI app; Alexa integration | Python SDK and web dashboard; Hugging Face Spaces app store; MuJoCo simulation; LeRobot / Hugging Face model hub; Conversation, hand-tracker, and radio apps at launch; Discord maker community |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.

