Compare
Figure 02 vs Mirokaï
Quick verdict
Mirokaï leads on 7 of 12 comparable rows
Figure 02 leads on Speed, Payload, Battery, and Price (+1 more). Mirokaï leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Countries, and Mobility (+3 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose Figure 02 if…
- Budget is a priority and Figure 02 lists lower ($20,000+).
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Figure 02 targets directly.
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Mirokaï if…
- You want higher readiness (81/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 74/100).
- Your main goal is elder care, which Mirokaï targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | Figure 02  Figure AILeads 5 | Mirokaï  Enchanted ToolsLeads 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 74 | 81 |
| Reality Score | 68 | 74 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 85% |
| Speed | 4.3 km/h | 3.2 km/h |
| Payload | 20 kg | 3 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 123 cm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 26 kg |
| Battery | 5 h | 4 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $20,000+ | $30,000+ |
| Market Status | Prototype | Limited |
| Availability | Prototype | Limited |
| Countries | United States | France, Japan, United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 85 | 86 |
| Manipulation | 80 | 70 |
| Perception | 75 | 88 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 76 |
| Social Interaction | 55 | 94 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 72 |
| Sensors | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors | 2× RGBD cameras, 2× IR cameras, 9× ToF cameras, 6× ultrasound, 4× microphones, 3× IMUs, torque sensors |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi | Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz & 5 GHz |
| Ecosystem | OpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet management | Enchanted Tools Web API; Mirokaï simulator (pymirokai); ROS-based stack; Multi-LLM voice stack |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.