Compare
Figure 02 vs Jennie
Quick verdict
Figure 02 leads on 5 of 10 comparable rows
Figure 02 leads on Reality Score, Mobility, Manipulation, and Autonomy (+1 more). Jennie leads on Readiness Score, Battery, Price, and Perception (+1 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose Figure 02 if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Figure 02 targets directly.
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a humanoid form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
Choose Jennie if…
- Budget is a priority and Jennie lists lower ($1,500).
- Your main goal is elder care, which Jennie targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
- You prefer a animal-like form factor over the alternatives in this compare.
| Spec | Figure 02  Figure AILeads 5 | Jennie  TombotLeads 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 74 | 78 |
| Reality Score | 68 | 66 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 85% |
| Speed | 4.3 km/h | Not mobile |
| Payload | 20 kg | Unknown |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 35 cm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 2.95 kg (6.5 lb) |
| Battery | 5 h | 4–6 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Animal-like |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $20,000+ | $1,500 |
| Market Status | Prototype | Waitlist |
| Availability | Prototype | Waitlist |
| Countries | United States | United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 85 | 8 |
| Manipulation | 80 | 18 |
| Perception | 75 | 84 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 52 |
| Social Interaction | 55 | 97 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 5 |
| Sensors | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors | Capacitive touch (full body), microphone array, accelerometer, gyroscope, ambient light, temperature |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi | Bluetooth, peer-to-peer Wi-Fi (companion app) |
| Ecosystem | OpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet management | Tombot smartphone app; Over-the-air behavior updates; ComfortResponse vocal stress detection |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.