Compare
Mirokaï vs Optimus Gen 2
Quick verdict
Mirokaï leads on 8 of 12 comparable rows
Mirokaï leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Mobility (+4 more). Optimus Gen 2 leads on Speed, Payload, Battery, and Manipulation.
Who should choose which?
Choose Mirokaï if…
- You want higher readiness (81/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 74/100).
- Your main goal is elder care, which Mirokaï targets directly.
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Optimus Gen 2 if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Optimus Gen 2 targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | Mirokaï  Enchanted ToolsLeads 8 | Optimus Gen 2  TeslaLeads 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 81 | 72 |
| Reality Score | 74 | 58 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 68% |
| Speed | 3.2 km/h | 8 km/h |
| Payload | 3 kg | 20 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 123 cm | 173 cm |
| Weight | 26 kg | 57 kg |
| Battery | 4 h | 8 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $30,000+ | Unknown |
| Market Status | Limited | Unknown |
| Availability | Limited | Unknown |
| Countries | France, Japan, United States | Unknown |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 86 | 70 |
| Manipulation | 70 | 75 |
| Perception | 88 | 68 |
| Autonomy | 76 | 60 |
| Social Interaction | 94 | 40 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 55 |
| Sensors | 2× RGBD cameras, 2× IR cameras, 9× ToF cameras, 6× ultrasound, 4× microphones, 3× IMUs, torque sensors | 8× cameras, hand tactile sensors, IMU |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz & 5 GHz | Wi-Fi, 5Gi |
| Ecosystem | Enchanted Tools Web API; Mirokaï simulator (pymirokai); ROS-based stack; Multi-LLM voice stack | Tesla AI stack |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.