Compare
Optimus Gen 2 vs Reachy 2
Quick verdict
Reachy 2 leads on 9 of 11 comparable rows
Optimus Gen 2 leads on Payload and Mobility. Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Battery (+5 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose Optimus Gen 2 if…
- Your main goal is home assistant, which Optimus Gen 2 targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Reachy 2 if…
- You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
- Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | Optimus Gen 2  TeslaLeads 2 | Reachy 2  Pollen RoboticsLeads 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 72 | 86 |
| Reality Score | 58 | 84 |
| Data Freshness | 68% | 85% |
| Speed | 8 km/h | Unknown |
| Payload | 20 kg | 3 kg per arm |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 173 cm | 136–166 cm |
| Weight | 57 kg | 32–50 kg |
| Battery | 8 h | 8–10 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | Unknown | $70,000+ |
| Market Status | Unknown | Limited |
| Availability | Unknown | Limited |
| Countries | Unknown | United States, France, Global (direct order) |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 70 | 68 |
| Manipulation | 75 | 88 |
| Perception | 68 | 86 |
| Autonomy | 60 | 72 |
| Social Interaction | 40 | 70 |
| Home Navigation | 55 | 58 |
| Sensors | 8× cameras, hand tactile sensors, IMU | 2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, 5Gi | Ethernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI) |
| Ecosystem | Tesla AI stack | ROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo) |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.