Compare
aeo vs Mirokaï
Quick verdict
aeo leads on 7 of 12 comparable rows
aeo leads on Reality Score, Data Freshness, Payload, and Battery (+3 more). Mirokaï leads on Readiness Score, Mobility, Perception, and Social Interaction (+1 more).
Who should choose which?
Choose aeo if…
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 82/100).
- Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Choose Mirokaï if…
- Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | aeo  Aeolus RoboticsLeads 7 | Mirokaï  Enchanted ToolsLeads 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 78 | 81 |
| Reality Score | 82 | 74 |
| Data Freshness | 100% | 85% |
| Speed | Unknown | 3.2 km/h |
| Payload | 3.6 kg per arm | 3 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | Unknown | 123 cm |
| Weight | Unknown | 26 kg |
| Battery | 8 h | 4 h |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | Unknown | $30,000+ |
| Market Status | Limited | Limited |
| Availability | Limited | Limited |
| Countries | Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, United States | France, Japan, United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 80 | 86 |
| Manipulation | 84 | 70 |
| Perception | 82 | 88 |
| Autonomy | 78 | 76 |
| Social Interaction | 72 | 94 |
| Home Navigation | 68 | 72 |
| Sensors | 360° vision, night-vision camera, posture/position detection, obstacle avoidance | 2× RGBD cameras, 2× IR cameras, 9× ToF cameras, 6× ultrasound, 4× microphones, 3× IMUs, torque sensors |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, web apps, native smartphone apps | Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz & 5 GHz |
| Ecosystem | Robot-as-a-service (RaaS) leasing; Plug-and-play attachments; Asratec integrations (Japan); Malibu AI integrations (Taiwan); Remote scheduling and alerting apps | Enchanted Tools Web API; Mirokaï simulator (pymirokai); ROS-based stack; Multi-LLM voice stack |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.