Compare

Apollo vs NEO Gamma

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

NEO Gamma leads on 6 of 11 comparable rows

Apollo leads on Reality Score, Data Freshness, Payload, and Countries (+1 more). NEO Gamma leads on Readiness Score, Price, Mobility, and Perception (+2 more).

Who should choose which?

Apollo
Choose Apollo if…
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
  • Strengths like manipulation and mobility match how you plan to use it at home.
NEO Gamma
Choose NEO Gamma if…
  • You want higher readiness (88/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Budget is a priority and NEO Gamma lists lower ($20,000).
  • You need a pre-order path today while alternatives are still prototype or coming soon.
  • Strengths like social interaction and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Performance
Readiness Score
76
88
Reality Score
84
78
Data Freshness
100%
85%
SpeedUnknown5 km/h walk (1.4 m/s)
Payload25 kg8 kg arm / 25 kg carry
Specs
Height173 cm168 cm
Weight72.5 kg30 kg
BatteryUnknown4 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$50,000+$20,000
Market StatusLimitedPre-order
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesUnited States, GermanyUnited States
Intelligence
Mobility
80
82
Manipulation
86
86
Perception
78
80
Autonomy
68
58
Social Interaction
62
88
Home Navigation
55
84
SensorsPerception stack unpublished on Apollo 2 page; LED mouth, chest status display, speechDual 8.85MP stereo fisheye cameras, 4 beamforming mics, IMU
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, Fleet Connect APIs (typical)Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G
EcosystemApollo 2 (bipedal or wheeled); Apptronik Artemis; Fleet Connect; Google DeepMind Gemini Robotics; Robot Park data collection; Hot-swappable battery packs; Enterprise pilot programsRedwood AI; 1X Expert remote guidance; Chores scheduling app
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.