Compare
Figure 02 vs NEO Gamma
Quick verdict
NEO Gamma leads on 7 of 10 comparable rows
Figure 02 leads on Payload, Mobility, and Autonomy. NEO Gamma leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Speed, and Manipulation (+3 more).
Who should choose which?

Choose Figure 02 if…
- You are tracking a prototype platform and do not need a buy box this year.
- Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.

Choose NEO Gamma if…
- You want higher readiness (88/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
- Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 76/100).
- You need a pre-order path today while alternatives are still prototype or coming soon.
- Strengths like social interaction and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
| Spec | ![]() Figure 02 Figure AILeads 3 | ![]() NEO Gamma 1XLeads 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Readiness Score | 74 | 88 |
| Reality Score | 68 | 76 |
| Data Freshness | 85% | 85% |
| Speed | 4.3 km/h | 5 km/h |
| Payload | 20 kg | 8 kg |
| Specs | ||
| Height | 168 cm | 168 cm |
| Weight | 70 kg | 30 kg |
| Battery | 5 h | Unknown |
| Form | Humanoid | Humanoid |
| Availability | ||
| Price | $20,000+ | $20,000 |
| Market Status | Prototype | Pre-order |
| Availability | Prototype | Limited |
| Countries | United States | United States |
| Intelligence | ||
| Mobility | 85 | 82 |
| Manipulation | 80 | 86 |
| Perception | 75 | 80 |
| Autonomy | 70 | 58 |
| Social Interaction | 55 | 88 |
| Home Navigation | 72 | 84 |
| Sensors | 6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors | Dual 8.85MP stereo fisheye cameras, 4 beamforming mics, IMU |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Ethernet, 5Gi | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G |
| Ecosystem | OpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet management | Redwood AI; 1X Expert remote guidance; Chores scheduling app |
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.

