HRHOMEBOT RADAR
Compare

Figure 02 vs Reachy 2

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Reachy 2 leads on 9 of 13 comparable rows

Figure 02 leads on Payload, Price, Mobility, and Home Navigation. Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Battery (+5 more).

Who should choose which?

Figure 02
Choose Figure 02 if…
  • Budget is a priority and Figure 02 lists lower ($20,000+).
  • Your main goal is home assistant, which Figure 02 targets directly.
  • Strengths like mobility and manipulation match how you plan to use it at home.
Reachy 2
Choose Reachy 2 if…
  • You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
  • Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Spec
Figure 02
Figure AI
Leads 4
Reachy 2
Pollen Robotics
Leads 9
Performance
Readiness Score
74
86
Reality Score
68
84
Data Freshness
85%
100%
Speed4.3 km/hUnknown
Payload20 kg3 kg per arm
Specs
Height168 cm136–166 cm
Weight70 kg32–50 kg
Battery5 h8–10 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$20,000+$70,000+
Market StatusPrototypeLimited
AvailabilityPrototypeLimited
CountriesUnited StatesUnited States, France, Global (direct order)
Intelligence
Mobility
85
68
Manipulation
80
88
Perception
75
86
Autonomy
70
72
Social Interaction
55
70
Home Navigation
72
58
Sensors6× RGB cameras, IMU, force-torque sensors2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs
ConnectivityWi-Fi, Ethernet, 5GiEthernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI)
EcosystemOpenAI integration (announced); Custom fleet managementROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.
View Figure 02 →View Reachy 2 →