Compare

Mirokaï vs Reachy 2

← Back to robots

Quick verdict

Mirokaï leads on 6 of 11 comparable rows

Mirokaï leads on Price, Mobility, Perception, and Autonomy (+2 more). Reachy 2 leads on Readiness Score, Reality Score, Data Freshness, and Battery (+1 more).

Who should choose which?

Mirokaï
Choose Mirokaï if…
  • Budget is a priority and Mirokaï lists lower ($30,000+).
  • Your main goal is elder care, which Mirokaï targets directly.
  • Strengths like social interaction and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Reachy 2
Choose Reachy 2 if…
  • You want higher readiness (86/100 vs peers) for near-term home use.
  • Verified shipping and public proof matter more to you (reality score 84/100).
  • Your main goal is education, which Reachy 2 targets directly.
  • Strengths like manipulation and perception match how you plan to use it at home.
Performance
Readiness Score
81
86
Reality Score
74
84
Data Freshness
85%
100%
Speed3.2 km/hUnknown
Payload3 kg3 kg per arm
Specs
Height123 cm136–166 cm
Weight26 kg32–50 kg
Battery4 h8–10 h
FormHumanoidHumanoid
Availability
Price$30,000+$70,000+
Market StatusLimitedLimited
AvailabilityLimitedLimited
CountriesFrance, Japan, United StatesUnited States, France, Global (direct order)
Intelligence
Mobility
86
68
Manipulation
70
88
Perception
88
86
Autonomy
76
72
Social Interaction
94
70
Home Navigation
72
58
Sensors2× RGBD cameras, 2× IR cameras, 9× ToF cameras, 6× ultrasound, 4× microphones, 3× IMUs, torque sensors2× IMX296 global-shutter stereo cameras, Orbbec Gemini 336 RGB-D, Luxonis OAK ToF, RPLIDAR S2, 2× lavalier mics, wheel IMUs
ConnectivityWi-Fi 2.4 GHz & 5 GHzEthernet, Wi-Fi (customer network for AI)
EcosystemEnchanted Tools Web API; Mirokaï simulator (pymirokai); ROS-based stack; Multi-LLM voice stackROS 2 Humble; Python SDK; Hugging Face LeRobot; Pollen-Vision perception library; VR teleoperation (Meta Quest 2/3); Docker simulation stack (Gazebo, MuJoCo)
Green cells mark the stronger value in each row across 2 robots.